Search for: "Stevens v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A." Results 1 - 5 of 5
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by MOTP
What if one holds that the contract was procured by barratry and is void, and the other one reaches the opposite conclusion? [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 10:00 am
"  [10] The petitioners argued that the respondents had opened themselves to liability under Rule 10b-5 by knowingly engaging in a scheme allowing Charter to make fraudulent statements to the SEC and the public. [11] Known as "scheme liability" actions, such actions came into use after the Supreme Court, in Central Bank of Denver, N.A. v. [read post]